JBitAoR
John Brouwer in the Act of Reading
Sunday, November 27, 2011
A Noiseless Patient Spider by Walt Whitman
A noiseless, patient spider,
I marked, where, on a little promontory, it stood, isolated;
Marked how, to explore the vacant, vast surrounding,
It launched forth filament, filament, filament, out of itself;
Ever unreeling them—ever tirelessly speeding them.
And you, O my Soul, where you stand,
Surrounded, surrounded, in measureless oceans of space,
Ceaselessly musing, venturing, throwing,—seeking the spheres, to connect them;
Till the bridge you will need, be formed—till the ductile anchor hold;
Till the gossamer thread you fling, catch somewhere, O my Soul.
I believe we all have had this experience, when we feel alone in a crowded room, and we throw out “lines” to other people, hoping the lines will stick and then the gap will be bridged. This experience is often repeated throughout life to all relationships. Weather the person is an intra- or extra-vert, the desire for a deep, lasting, wholesome friendship is constantly sought after. Whitman creates a wonderful metaphor, comparing the spider casting its gossamer silks into the air, hoping they will connect, to the relationships people strive to have. (I find that a greater sense of beauty is added in this because spider silk is one of the strongest substances known compared to it’s size.)
The pattern that Whitman uses is a great way to compare these two ideas and meld them into one. Bothe verses are five lines long, and each line is comparatively similar, except the last, when the first verse’s last line is about the spider releasing its thread constantly, and the last verse’s last line is about the hope that it will catch on something or someone.
Saturday, November 26, 2011
Vergissmeinnicht by Keith Douglas
Three weeks gone and the combatants gone
returning over the nightmare ground
we found the place again, and found
the soldier sprawling in the sun.
The frowning barrel of his gun
overshadowing. As we came on
that day, he hit my tank with one
like the entry of a demon.
Look. Here in the gunpit spoil
the dishonored picture of his girl
who has put: Steffi. Vergissmeinnicht.
in a copybook gothic script.
We see him almost with content,
abased, and seeming to have paid
and mocked at by his own equipment
that's hard and good when he's decayed.
But she would weep to see today
how on his skin the swart flies move;
the dust upon the paper eye
and the burst stomach like a cave.
For here the lover and killer are mingled
who had one body and one heart.
And death who had the soldier singled
has done the lover mortal hurt.
returning over the nightmare ground
we found the place again, and found
the soldier sprawling in the sun.
The frowning barrel of his gun
overshadowing. As we came on
that day, he hit my tank with one
like the entry of a demon.
Look. Here in the gunpit spoil
the dishonored picture of his girl
who has put: Steffi. Vergissmeinnicht.
in a copybook gothic script.
We see him almost with content,
abased, and seeming to have paid
and mocked at by his own equipment
that's hard and good when he's decayed.
But she would weep to see today
how on his skin the swart flies move;
the dust upon the paper eye
and the burst stomach like a cave.
For here the lover and killer are mingled
who had one body and one heart.
And death who had the soldier singled
has done the lover mortal hurt.
The first thing
that needs to be said is that “vergissmeinnicht” can either mean the flower,
Forget-me-not, or the phrase “forget me not”, which is perhaps more applicable to
this poem (but metaphors can be gleaned from the first.) From this, this small
notation adds to the vibe that Douglas is trying to convey, a detached (one
must either know German or at least understand the phrase to fully comprehend
the poem, and Douglas gives no personal feeling on the subject) yet also
profound meaning (just look to the last verse, this is probably the best
example of this.)
The meaning that is most fitting is the classic of how man is full of evil and hurt, but also of love, and how we can destroy things that are dear to others and us. The cadaver in the poem is the symbol of this duality, where the main character’s first impression of him in life was “like that of an entry of a demon.” However, in death, he is a calm, prostrate, almost more humane figure, with a note from his loved one that in his last moments was reading (a gunpit is a slit in a trench where a barrel of a gun rests) representing the humanity that once was or even is still in him. It is also interesting to note how in the last stanza Douglas gives the impression that the soldier’s death was not his fault, but Death’s.
A Thankful Poem
The Last Thursday
The Chill
Rushes
through me.
I move toward
the door
looking for
warmth
I take
a Knife
a Fork
a Spoon
wrap them in
a
paper napkin
like a child
or as a carpenter
that wraps
his tools in
leather, to
protect
and use for
great purpose
The carnage
is all that
is left
from the
feast
A battle
field
of lost bits
of
the innards
of the yams
the flesh of
hams
blood of
jello
oozing with
spilt gravy
the aroma
was most appetizing
as any soldier
can smell
be for the
storm
now
it is all
calm
Laughing
can be heard
from the hearth
chairs pulled
around the
television
wondering
who will win the game
a game of
cards has been started
on the table
were the entertainment was previously
the cousins
are downstairs
apples to
apples
and the air hockey
is humming
Late in the evening
I sit
absorbed
in the
uncles talk
of business
of livestalk
of general conversation
and
speculation
the word’s warmth
envelops me
The next day
I savor
and enjoy
the left-overs
and memories
of
yesterday.
Sunday, November 13, 2011
Curiosity by Alastair Reid
may
have killed the cat; more likely
the cat was just unlucky, or else curious
to see what death was like, having no cause
to go on licking paws, or fathering
litter on litter of kittens, predictably.
the cat was just unlucky, or else curious
to see what death was like, having no cause
to go on licking paws, or fathering
litter on litter of kittens, predictably.
Nevertheless,
to be curious
is dangerous enough. To distrust
what is always said, what seems,
to ask old questions, interfere in dreams,
leave home, smell rats, have hunches
do not endear cats to those doggy circles
where well-smelt baskets, suitable wives, good lunches
are the order of things, and where prevails
much wagging of incurious heads and tails.
is dangerous enough. To distrust
what is always said, what seems,
to ask old questions, interfere in dreams,
leave home, smell rats, have hunches
do not endear cats to those doggy circles
where well-smelt baskets, suitable wives, good lunches
are the order of things, and where prevails
much wagging of incurious heads and tails.
Face
it. Curiosity
will not cause us to die-
only lack of it will.
Never to want to see
the other side of the hill
or that improbable country
where living is an idyll
(although a probably hell)
would kill us all.
Only the curious
have, if they live, a tale
worth telling at all.
will not cause us to die-
only lack of it will.
Never to want to see
the other side of the hill
or that improbable country
where living is an idyll
(although a probably hell)
would kill us all.
Only the curious
have, if they live, a tale
worth telling at all.
Dogs
say cats love too much, are irresponsible,
are changeable, marry too many wives,
desert their children, chill all dinner tables
with tales of their nine lives.
Well, they are lucky. Let them be
nine-lived and contradictory,
curious enough to change, prepared to pay
the cat price, which is to die
and die again and again,
each time with no less pain.
A cat minority of one
is all that can be counted on
to tell the truth. And what cats have to tell
on each return from hell
is this: that dying is what the living do,
that dying is what the loving do,
and that dead dogs are those who do not know
that dying is what, to live, each has to do.
are changeable, marry too many wives,
desert their children, chill all dinner tables
with tales of their nine lives.
Well, they are lucky. Let them be
nine-lived and contradictory,
curious enough to change, prepared to pay
the cat price, which is to die
and die again and again,
each time with no less pain.
A cat minority of one
is all that can be counted on
to tell the truth. And what cats have to tell
on each return from hell
is this: that dying is what the living do,
that dying is what the loving do,
and that dead dogs are those who do not know
that dying is what, to live, each has to do.
Inspiring. Is not that everyone
praises in a person? The ability to look to the horizon and not only admire the
beauty of it (any dog can do that) but also wonder what is beyond that, and
take it to the next level. Many fall into the normalcy of the everyday, not taking
any chances, and wondering why they feel so empty.
Others, however, realize that there can be more, if they are willing to pay for
it. But in the end it was worth it, because the vibrancy is what life is all about. This can be easily explained
with Eli Wiesel’s quote “The opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference. The opposite of
beauty is not ugliness, it's indifference. The opposite of faith is not heresy,
its indifference. And the opposite of life is not death, but indifference
between life and death.” Great variance gives life its meaning, while entropy
only gives a general life represented by the color beige.
From a stylistic point of view, I liked also the format by
Mr. Reid, with an almost introduction, a verse in pseudo-paragraph form, a
second differently styled verse, then
the last verse much like verse one and the intro combined. Also, the metaphors
contrasting the cats and the dogs was clever too.
Sunday, October 30, 2011
The Possibility by James Fenton
The lizard on the wall, engrossed,
The sudden silence from the wood
Are telling me that I have lost
The possibility of good.
I know this flower is beautiful
And yesterday it seemed to be,
It opened like a crimson hand.
It was not beautiful to me.
I know that work is beautiful.
It is a boon. It is a good.
Unless my working were a way
Of squandering my solitude.
And solitude was beautiful
When I was sure that I was strong.
I thought it was a medium
In which to grow, but I was wrong.
The jays are swearing in the wood.
The lizard moves with ugly speed.
The flower closes like a fist.
The possibility recedes.
The sudden silence from the wood
Are telling me that I have lost
The possibility of good.
I know this flower is beautiful
And yesterday it seemed to be,
It opened like a crimson hand.
It was not beautiful to me.
I know that work is beautiful.
It is a boon. It is a good.
Unless my working were a way
Of squandering my solitude.
And solitude was beautiful
When I was sure that I was strong.
I thought it was a medium
In which to grow, but I was wrong.
The jays are swearing in the wood.
The lizard moves with ugly speed.
The flower closes like a fist.
The possibility recedes.
There is
danger in believing solitude is the all encompassing escape, refuge, and inspiration
of originality and creativity. And perhaps staying in a place for so long that
the magical qualities are gone and becoming disenchanted with the once
wonderful is just as important. This poem strikes a chord with me because I could
see myself becoming in the future a botanist or forester, which would require immense
amounts of solitude. The thing is, I am not scared of solitude, but rather I find
comforting at times, just as at times a large crowd can become a frightening
and/or dull place. I believe that Fenton was conveying the necessity of being brutally
honest with ourselves, which is exemplified by stanza four, and especially when
“I was sure that I was strong.” If we are not careful, we can isolate ourselves
in an environment that is not suited for us “in which to grow,” but will stunt
us and stifle us, whether that is in Isolation, like the environment of the
poem, or in the opposite spectrum Publicity, which can be almost just like Isolation, but with different lizards and flowers.
The Coming of Wisdom with Time by William Butler Yeats
Though leaves are many, the root is one;
Through all the lying days of my youth
I swayed my leaves and flowers in the sun;
Now I may wither into the truth.
Through all the lying days of my youth
I swayed my leaves and flowers in the sun;
Now I may wither into the truth.
Why
would I choose such a short poem? Probably because something so small is often ultra-concentrated.
Or maybe I just chose this poem because perhaps I’m feeling a bit melancholy.
Is not the Truth the best thing for everyone? Is not it the most wonderful
thing? Best I can tell, Yeats disagrees. To find out, one must pick the poem apart.
With the poem being so short, one must take the poem one line at a time.
“Though
leaves are many, the root is one.” Straightforward. Any plant one is likely to
find is made up of this. The leaves that in the summer convert the sun to
usable energy, and the root, which stores the energy and collects nutrients
from the ground.
“Through
all the lying days of my youth” The highlight is lying, which can mean either that he was telling un-truths in his
youth, or that he (or the day, depending on who one interprets the subject is)
is resting (beneath the shade of a tree perhaps?)
“I
swayed my leaves and flowers in the sun” This brings an image of life, whether
the swaying is celebration, dancing, or something else vibrant. Also, note the
sun, which gives nourishment.
“Now
I may wither into the truth” Now the lying is revealed. No longer is he alive
with a lie, but dead, dying, or at least retreating into himself, with the
truth to stark for life to grow. The winter has entered his soul, and there is
no sun.
Sunday, October 9, 2011
The Halo That Would Not Light by Lucie Brock-Broido
When, after many
years, the raptor beak
Let loose of you,
He
dropped your tiny body
In the
scarab-colored hollow
Of
a carriage, left you like a finch
Wrapped in its nest
of linens wound
With linden leaves
in a child’s cardboard box.
Tonight the wind is
hover-
Hunting as the
leather seats of swings go back
And forth with no
one in them
As certain and
invisible as
Red
scarves silking endlessly
From a magician’s
hollow hat
And
the spectacular catastrophe
Of your endless
childhood
Is done.
Oh what
a despondent poem. From the very beginning, it has the sorrowful tone of
something lost. And from the poem, the best guess of what is lost is a child.
Take the title “The Halo That Would Not Light.” What beings have halos? Only
things that are pure and gentile, ‘a little angel’ also comes to mind. But it
would not light? Something is wrong. Brock-Broido uses these “once removed” clichés
through her poem. (This sadness is not uncommon for her poems, a common subject
of her poetry is death and mortality, according The Poetry
Foundation.org) The
second line says, “the raptor beak let loose of you.” What other Avian species
are associated with birth? Only Raptor suggests something much more violent. After
this, the childish diction continues, with “tiny body,” “carriage,” “linens,”
among others, but is followed closely with more foreboding words, words that suggest
at least dried-out-and-forgotten, like “scarab-colored hollow” (Egyptian mummy?),
“linden leaves in a child’s cardboard box” (which by the way are heart shaped
leaves) and no one in swings to be pushed. However, the real decisive factor is
that the child never even lived is the very last line. If a childhood is endless,
it means that the child never grew up. Moreover, if it is done, they are never
going to grow up
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)